Felons: Live Discussion
posted by Bietz on November 5th, 2008
LOS ANGELES, Cali. — There are many who are requesting information on what is being run on the current topic. Hopefully we can have a productive discussion here on Wednesday at 7:30 PM PST.
I hope you can join me, Mike Bietz, for a discussion of the Felons resolution. The live-blog window can be found after the jump.
You can watch/participate here:
Popularity: 3% [?]
test
Posted from: 69.120.236.168
November 4th, 2008 13:37
What happened to “An Hour or so with Mike Bietz”? I miss that
Posted from: 96.229.143.242
November 4th, 2008 13:49
well, the way our office network was setup made it difficult to bypass the firewall to use the talkshoe software. hopefully we can bring it back… but i need to become more versed in network configuration.
Posted from: 98.201.178.59
November 4th, 2008 15:02
is this a vocal blog, or will it function like a chat room?
Posted from: 96.229.143.242
November 4th, 2008 15:15
It is a moderated chat-room type thing.
Posted from: 75.72.79.154
November 4th, 2008 17:28
is this going to get archived somewhere?
Posted from: 24.46.207.84
November 4th, 2008 17:45
Yeah, if we aren’t free at that time, will be it archived so we can view it later?
Posted from: 24.46.207.84
November 4th, 2008 17:46
it be*
Posted from: 72.213.162.95
November 4th, 2008 18:46
Will this be archived somewhere?
Posted from: 69.140.158.182
November 4th, 2008 19:42
Are there an unusual number of people asking about arguments on this topic?
Posted from: 71.169.246.144
November 5th, 2008 14:31
@ 9
Yeah, I think so; at least I don’t remember nearly as many people asking about positions.
It may be because people are at a loss for good conventional negative cases. But I’m sure that’ll change by Apple Valley.
Posted from: 71.42.216.162
November 5th, 2008 15:17
i won’t be participating in this, but i posted on the meadows thread about what people are running.
Posted from: 76.117.189.67
November 5th, 2008 20:35
Is this still happening. I’s like 5 minutes after it was supposed to start
Posted from: 68.241.212.93
November 5th, 2008 21:29
re: the live chat
if i ever hear “the gift” argument in a round a judge you will not like the result
Posted from: 68.92.214.14
November 5th, 2008 22:00
I love how certain people just explained how it is, while Anjan,Eric and Mike listened and “learned”. CLASSIC!!!!!
Posted from: 98.218.230.121
November 5th, 2008 22:37
I was multitasking while watching my Tivo-ed episode of 90210 from last night. It was not clear which task allowed me to learn more.
Posted from: 76.94.89.102
November 5th, 2008 23:11
I take it that means this wasn’t worth the effort?
Posted from: 24.183.38.132
November 6th, 2008 00:07
i think it was nice, but it would be better if we explored arguments beyond “the gift.”
did anyone make the return rights after rehabilitized aff?
I’m also curious how people who advocate for CP’s in LD define competitiveness. In policy its based on the text and the function of plan… In LD there is no plan. I think this is just a jargon translation issue in that the concept is similar to policy, though not entirely the same, but the jargon doesn’t entirely match.
Posted from: 72.153.181.125
November 6th, 2008 15:41
If it’s a gift, why would the receiver feel indebted/subjugated?
Posted from: 72.153.181.125
November 6th, 2008 15:48
@17:
Return rights after rehab sounds like a CP on the Neg to me…
Posted from: 71.169.22.120
November 7th, 2008 20:27
@17
Theyll say the defition of retain is “to keep possesion of”
then if your screwed running giving rights back because felons didnt really keep possesion of the right to vote