<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building an Institutional Memory: Woodward</title>
	<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-261571</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-261571</guid>
		<description>"2004 FIRST YEAR DIVISION
Champion – Highland Park AD (Matt Andrews &#38; D)
Runner Up – Chattahoochee AS (Garret Abelkop &#38; S)"

Garret was a frosh on the 2001-02 WMD topic and got walked over in the semis of woodward (he debated with John Warden)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;2004 FIRST YEAR DIVISION<br />
Champion – Highland Park AD (Matt Andrews &amp; D)<br />
Runner Up – Chattahoochee AS (Garret Abelkop &amp; S)&#8221;</p>
<p>Garret was a frosh on the 2001-02 WMD topic and got walked over in the semis of woodward (he debated with John Warden)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael mangus</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232623</link>
		<dc:creator>michael mangus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232623</guid>
		<description>er, that last line should be 'zero-derivation' not 'zero-formation'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, that last line should be &#8216;zero-derivation&#8217; not &#8216;zero-formation&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael mangus</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232621</link>
		<dc:creator>michael mangus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232621</guid>
		<description>zero derivation, at least in my experience, just refers to converting a lexical item to a new lexical class. in this case, an inflectional affix has been applied to the new verb form (semi + ing) but the existence of that verb in the lexicon indicates that zero derivation has taken place. if -ing was a derivational, rather than inflectional, affix you would have a point (that would be an example of derivation and not word formation). as far as i know, 'semi-ing,' 'semi-ed,' etc are all just inflected forms of the same lexeme, semi (v), derived by zero-formation (or "conversion") from semi (n).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zero derivation, at least in my experience, just refers to converting a lexical item to a new lexical class. in this case, an inflectional affix has been applied to the new verb form (semi + ing) but the existence of that verb in the lexicon indicates that zero derivation has taken place. if -ing was a derivational, rather than inflectional, affix you would have a point (that would be an example of derivation and not word formation). as far as i know, &#8217;semi-ing,&#8217; &#8217;semi-ed,&#8217; etc are all just inflected forms of the same lexeme, semi (v), derived by zero-formation (or &#8220;conversion&#8221;) from semi (n).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohail</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232606</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232606</guid>
		<description>Mangus, can you explain that concept a bit more. I thought a zero derivation had to be the same as the word like (turn as a noun and as a verb). So wouldn't semi-ing not be a zero derivation? (I have no real background in linguistics but I like the field and perhaps will major in it).

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mangus, can you explain that concept a bit more. I thought a zero derivation had to be the same as the word like (turn as a noun and as a verb). So wouldn&#8217;t semi-ing not be a zero derivation? (I have no real background in linguistics but I like the field and perhaps will major in it).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael mangus</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232344</link>
		<dc:creator>michael mangus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232344</guid>
		<description>zero derivation is one of the best types of word formation. get with the morphosyntactic program bietz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zero derivation is one of the best types of word formation. get with the morphosyntactic program bietz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bietz</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232298</link>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232298</guid>
		<description>what does semi-ing mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does semi-ing mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232293</guid>
		<description>I should also add Eric Palmer who reached quarters of TOC after only 2 years of debate experience and won some other shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add Eric Palmer who reached quarters of TOC after only 2 years of debate experience and won some other shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navot</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232267</link>
		<dc:creator>Navot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232267</guid>
		<description>McKay debated all four years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKay debated all four years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paras Kumar</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232261</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232261</guid>
		<description>Didnt John McKay start really late as well? and he ended up semi-ing at the TOC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didnt John McKay start really late as well? and he ended up semi-ing at the TOC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://victorybriefsdaily.com/2008/04/10/building-an-institutional-memory-woodward/#comment-232218</guid>
		<description>anon:

Last year 3/4 TOC semifinalists started their careers pretty late. Matt Aks began debate as a sophomore, Patrick Diehl switched from policy to ld in either his sophomore or junior year (I know he went JV at Glenbrooks his junior year), and I think that David McGough did something similar.

There are probably other cases that I'm neglecting, these just seem to be the most recent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon:</p>
<p>Last year 3/4 TOC semifinalists started their careers pretty late. Matt Aks began debate as a sophomore, Patrick Diehl switched from policy to ld in either his sophomore or junior year (I know he went JV at Glenbrooks his junior year), and I think that David McGough did something similar.</p>
<p>There are probably other cases that I&#8217;m neglecting, these just seem to be the most recent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
