As a summary of stip poker gratis casino par internet poker game software roulette online gratis casinos espana portal…

Get jeux casino gratuits giochi keno gratis in linea…

Dar probabilità roulette casino on line con…

It must be noted play free baccarat internet black jack…

Recently free online video poker online poker free…

Rate strip poker regeln online poker ohne registrierung…

Vamos a empezar con esto texas holdem rules poker frei spielen…

since my last post for some reason or another didnt appear:

congrats wade for rolling through prelims, chris for winning, moerner for speaking pretty, dfk on repping berroweeks, and cockroft for repping the Nietzsche. Sorry for seeming accusatory at the tourn, and congrats on the breakout(altho i think it’s funny that finals of one of the year’s hardest semis bids isnt considered breaking out).

btw, if you dont wanta have to debate the Nietzsche K, then dont make assumptions that make your ac link. it’s not that hard. i promise. (note that the unjust=deficient in justice is not a very good way to do this)

Also, what were the positions in semis? It seems like if we are to the point in LD where we are kicking counterplans in the NR that ae turned and running lots of K’s etc, perhaps its to talk more about the specifics of arguments in these big debates. Anyone game?

Just my thoughts.

Timmons

never saw this crockroft guy but props for running nietzsche. ld has some serious philosophical issues to deal with. i mean we could “maintain the integrity” of the activity by ignoring them but i think moral skepticism is a good thing to know how to respond to – with something other than the BUT GENOCIDE IS IMMORAL response. or theory. theory is being used to exclude all sorts of good arguments. i dont mean to say that i think multiple short a prioris are good for debate (because i dont) but the idea that the neg has to defend a normative statement (in this case that we ought to use the death penalty) is a pretty arbitrary burden to hand out. the idea that it is morally reprehensible to use the death penalty is also an assumption in the resolution. so when people are like OH DEAR attacking assumptions is bad – nietzsche is illegit – i think that its important to notice that the other option – to say that the death penalty is moral – is also just attacking an assumption in the statement. attacking multiple assumptions may be bad for theoretical reasons but JUST attacking the assumption that morality has some objective content does not seem unfair at all – just unconventional perhaps.

Keep it up!

michelinmassey.

This page is actually not accessible through one of the office computers at Bronx Science because the language on this thread was filtered. Lovely.

Josh and AT are right, particularly about how poorly some of the humor — a term I use loosely here — reflects upon the posters and the activity. Parents read these threads.

Sorry about the typo, Daniel.

I do not go to Colleyville Heritage. I go to Los Altos.

These boards are read by parents and school administrators. Many of these comments reflect very poorly on all of us.

Please stop.

you’re an asshole. plain and simple. i hate to resort to ad hominems, but A. its true and B. you probably won’t understand a reasoned complaint against your conduct. anyway, here it is:

this is exactly the sort of behavior that i feel VBD and the activity should try to fight. debate is a social activity, and we should encourage everyone to speak and share their viewpoint, even if it is just a silly joke on a message board. there is a reason this activity is declining in participation, and if it takes message boards to solve it, so be it. does that mean that every kid who wished their friend or teammate good luck doesn’t count either unless they’ve won something too? sean wynn is funny, and if you don’t think so, you’re welcome to that opinion, but you don’t have to be an asshole about it.

people who are good at the activity don’t speak, and i think that’s a good point.but i don’t think its a good thing. perhaps we are all too mired in the cult of personality to realize that debate is about more than just winning, its about a social community and academic experience that treats every high schooler with a dream and determination as an equal. everyone should speak. i wish we were all as vocal as sean wynn. he’s a great friend, a great influence on the activity, and god forbid someone actually develop personality or panache in debate. that would be like, the worst thing ever. almost as bad as if we let minorities in, right?

I am no prude but come on now…

And yeah, i’m not going to lie it was funny shit when you said it.

Yeah matt, it was definitely unexpected. I’ve seen NC’s kicked before, but a counterplan….absolutely shocking.

seriously, congratulations to andrew.

I’d also like to congratulate Bronx Science’s Andrew Markoff and Regan Bozman on making it to finals in the St. Mark’s Hoedown; Andrew and Regan were the top seed, and the top two speakers, and will debate the round with Bishop Guertin Monday afternoon at the Glenbrooks. (Thank you to Tim Mahoney and Aaron Kall for being so accommodating, as both Bronx Science and Bishop Guertin had flights to catch.)

this wasn’t funny.

Love you grin*** no donatti.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=roft

cockroft loses.
sean wynn wynns.

SARCASM EXISTS OUTSIDE OF HOUSTON!?!?! OH NOOOOOO000!!

never knew that “roft” meant huge in ebonics. good job creative, original. u get a gold star in class today

Greatest strategy ever.

and i dont think u can really make a determination on which variation is funnier becuase i GAURUNTEE that u have heard every single one. If u hav actually sat down and came up with everyone u can think of, and then made a determination that, yes, SOFTCOCK is the funniest, then power to you….But u couldnt possibly have done this becuase there are literally hundreds of names.

if such humor continues to persist, i think i might have to just change my last name to Penis…then maybe the joke will end becuase its just too damn obvious. and if u do make fun of the name, ur not original, uve just joined one of the many people to have the idea float in there brain that cock does mean penia and ur poetic mind manifested a penis variation of somethin and then laughed like a fifth grader when the teacher said penis as a scientific term.

But if u are to make fun of it, be original or something. If it helps, the origion on of my last name makes it mean “chicken farmer.” If penis jokes continue to persist then ur not tryin hard enough (o get it, like dicks can be hard too). truely new ones will actually make me kinda happy becuase itll give me somethin to do, in coming up with comebacks or just being angry.

And if when i was saying “coming” made u giggle in correlation with me saying things about the phallus then u did get it.

and to post 132: that was pretty ironic and ill give it to u

So basically my last names spawns creativity. so if brilliance strikes u with another linguistic gift please be sure to tell me becuase i feel i have heard all of them.

PS. screw u john :)

Damn i never knew i was a tool, but ok.

and good variation of the name….never heard someone call me softcock before…i understand the genius of it becuase u switch the syllables and then change roft to SOFT, as in not hard, which would be a woody…i get it.

hope this didnt sound too testy…HA get it

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/tx/stmarks/info.asp?p=11