VBD Videos: 2006 Victory Briefs Round Robin Prelim I
posted by Bietz on May 21st, 2007
SANTA MONICA, Calif. - Here is a video of a prelim round from the 2006 Victory Briefs Round Robin. The round features Ryan Cooper of Westlake High School in Texas on the affirmative versus David Weeks of Highland Park High School in Texas on the negative.
Tomorrow will be the VBT Final Round 2006.
The round appears after the jump.
If you are using a Mac, I would definitely install the free program Flip4Mac.
If you cannot see the embedded player, try using this link to use your standalone WMV player.
Please make sure you visit our videos page to see all of the videos we are adding!
Popularity: 1%
test
17 Responses to “VBD Videos: 2006 Victory Briefs Round Robin Prelim I”
Leave a Reply
Most Popular Posts
- Patrick Diehl is TOC Champion
- Ryan Zehner Crowned NCFL Champion
- Crystallize: Doggin' It
- Picturing the NCFL
- Regis Takes First-Ever NCFL Public Forum Title
- Fitting Middle School Debaters Into the Equation
- NFL Nationals LD Resolution Announced
- Glenbrook North Captures Policy TOC Title
- VBD Videos: Victory Briefs Round Robin - Semifinal Round
- The Nation Student Writing Contest
Posted from: 71.60.209.85
May 21st, 2007 18:37
Another solid video. Thanks VB.
Posted from: 68.209.198.15
May 21st, 2007 19:00
“Nietzsche writes:
But if we called a leaf a leaf, then we’d really not be referring to leaves at large, but rather an empirical leaf, one that man can poke. However, when the speaker references the signified leaviness of leaves, we abstract infinite leaves into a characature of leaf!
The implication is that the AC made arguments. The specificity of our fantastic Nietzsche is thus obviously preclusive of their ability to linguistically convey ontologically subjective concepts via epistemologically subjective media.”
Posted from: 68.201.215.129
May 21st, 2007 19:03
who wins this rounds
Posted from: 128.12.50.69
May 21st, 2007 19:52
Hehe, I remember being very peeved by VB’s decision to record my round against Diehl at the second half of this tournament last year. I was trying to argue against micropolitics with the classic “there’s only 2 people in the room to convince and you’ve just alienated one of them,” but the camera in the back seemed to spell impending doom for the argument.
Posted from: 130.132.143.49
May 21st, 2007 19:52
weeks seeing as how he was in finals…
Posted from: 128.12.50.69
May 21st, 2007 19:57
Also, because gossip is fun -
Rumor has it that this round pissed off one of the judges (some ex-debater lawyer I think) and made him quit judging. Tru?
Posted from: 68.209.198.15
May 21st, 2007 20:18
bobby - i think that was becca traber this year. apparently the guy hadnt judged in some ridiculous number of years and had signed up to judge for the rr and the tournament and ended up not judging the tournament since he decided he was done with judging entirely.
Posted from: 130.132.143.49
May 21st, 2007 20:26
Wow i made a really stupid comment. i confused this round with ToC. I actually don’t know who won
Posted from: 74.70.149.223
May 21st, 2007 20:54
mmm i love VB
Posted from: 24.162.54.183
May 21st, 2007 20:58
COOP
Posted from: 74.70.149.223
May 21st, 2007 21:35
Some of dweeks ans to the Condo extension seemed new
Posted from: 69.91.40.233
May 22nd, 2007 01:29
a highly language critiqued debate
Posted from: 76.102.6.251
May 22nd, 2007 11:46
varun–weeks was in finals of both.
Posted from: 130.132.143.49
May 22nd, 2007 12:15
wow what a coincidence :P
Posted from: 166.127.1.202
May 26th, 2007 14:07
Hahahah how did this round come back to haunt me a year and a half later?
And… Bobby is right. This round did make some judge quit. I still feel bad about that.
Posted from: 75.2.147.65
May 27th, 2007 11:49
who won? panel?
Posted from: 71.202.108.208
June 23rd, 2007 23:04
yea who won this round?