2005 in Review: Themes
Larry McGrath has submitted to me the newest installment of “Neat Things by Larry,” but I’ll give him the honor of being the first column of the new year by posting it tomorrow. We’re about a half hour short of the New Year here in New York, which means that the first official post of the year 2006 is on its way (recalibrated to Pacific Standard Time, of course). In the meantime, a retrospective on two themes, with a third forthcoming. Enjoy the final few hours and minutes of the year 2005!
GENEROSITY
The Voices Foundation for the Promotion of High School Debate had gained the support of many volunteers from its inception, and in the wake of John McKay’s passing, a wave of donations and the support of his family allowed for McKay’s project of sending debaters to different tournaments in other parts of the country to be realized. In this case, several students were given scholarships to compete at the Minneapple, Hendrick Hudson, and Manchester’s Tim Averill Invitational, tournaments selected by the founder of Voices and his family. (Details are being arranged to allow students who received Hen Hud scholarships to compete elsewhere.)
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, many tournaments heeded the call of Jane Boyd to collection funds to be directed towards relief for victims. In terms of specific relief to debate teams and debaters, multiple schools in Texas opened their doors to competitors, and some schools arranged to donate large amounts of evidence to affected teams.
MOTHER NATURE
The weather affected debate in a number of ways over the course of the year. Debaters at the Columbia Invitational found the tournament cut short after three rounds of competition; awards were granted, but as there were no outrounds, the tournament’s bids were voided for the year. Just a week later in Atlanta, an ice storm caused a similarly dangerous situation at Emory University’s Barkley Forum for High Schools. Rounds could not be held on the Saturday of the tournament, and ultimately, the tournament could only hold four preliminary rounds. Clearing directly to octafinals, Emory’s fiftieth installment was permitted to adopt a system previously granted only to the policy tournament at the MBA Southern Bell Forum: all sixteen participants in the first outround would be awarded bids to the Tournament of Champions. In both cases, tournament officials made the correct call by placing student safety first. While the staff of both invitationals suffered some immediate criticism for some of their decisions, hopefully in the weeks after, we all remembered that weather-related issues need to be taken seriously.
Fortunately, as noted, in the face of the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, the effects of the weather also brought out the better side of many people. As the affected areas continue to rebuild, many programs continue to rebuild. The Louisiana High School Speech League has maintained a comprehensive schedule and plans to hold its state tournament. In terms of travel tournaments, as appears to be the theme he Isidore Newman Classic will be hosted by Dulles High School at its first-ever Viking Rampage.
Most recently, of course, a snow storm forced the cancellation of the Malcolm A. Bump Memorial Tournament at Hendrick Hudson, after months of preparation and the assembly of an all-star list of former Hen Hud debaters. (The assembled alumni included past champions and finalists at the Glenbrooks, St. Mark’s, Harvard, Lexington, Manchester, T.A. Edison, and a past top speaker at the TOC among a field of uniformly very fine former debaters.) Coupled with the cancellation of the Newburgh Debate Festival in the previous month–due not to weather, but complications at the school–the year had most definitely seen a series of weather-related dilemmas. (That’s not to mention the traditional snow at Harvard, of course!)
SHATTERING AND MAINTAINING RECORDS
Check back!
Popularity: 4%
test
7 Responses to “2005 in Review: Themes”
Leave a Reply
Most Popular Posts
- Andy Werner Wins the Blake Edie Holiday Tournament
- 2005 in Review: Themes
- Alta (Temporarily) Concludes After Quarters
- BREAKING NEWS: Eminent Domain
- North Dakota Bans Public Forum Resolution
- MBA Extemp Round Robin Announced
- Public Forum Debate December Topic Analysis
- Caitlin Halpern Wins the Princeton Classic
- Patrick Mahoney Wins the UT Longhorn Classic
- Topic for Debate: Stanley Tookie Williams

Posted from: 64.12.116.203
December 31st, 2005 21:00
FIRST Comment of 2006! Does this make me cool or a loser for staying home on New Year’s Eve and thinking of Victory Briefs as I start my new year?
On second thought… it may be best if no one answers this question.
Posted from: 83.8.249.41
January 1st, 2006 03:41
As far as I know (and saw on CX-L), bids at Emory were never certified.
Posted from: 72.130.183.145
January 1st, 2006 04:12
bids had to be certified, as at least 2 people got at-larges off emory bids (nel smiley and syam palakurthy) and several others (tanya choudhury, christian tarsney, michael mangus, kim larson) did not have two other bids besides emory. the cx-l is misleading, as bids were only given out in LD.
Posted from: 68.194.96.227
January 1st, 2006 06:19
They were? I thought they were given out in CX as well. (One of our policy teams was devastated that they had placed in the top 32 but not the top 16.)
Posted from: 83.8.254.130
January 1st, 2006 08:09
CX-L typically had results from every tournament in order to be certified for bids. There was even an issue with USC the year before Hamilton won it that because they hadn’t sent in official results by the deadline they would not get their finals bid. Therefore, even LD only tournaments would have results sent out to the mailing list by JW Patterson… Random story from too much time in Policy lounge with JW at Glenbrooks - originally, it was started because people would lie about where they placed at various tournaments. Now, with internet coverage of results of every TOC tournament, it’s more of a moot point, but the “Certified” results were sent out nonetheless, with every tournament that officially garnered TOC bids. The tournament did NOT have a bid. However, the TOC can grant an at-large on any basis that it wants, including somebody with no bids. The only binding rule they have is that if you have 3 bids or more, they cannot refuse your application (if you have 2 bids, then it’s space-available).
Posted from: 165.123.174.196
January 1st, 2006 17:58
for the historical, rather than the boyle-ian record-
the year before usc had no problem recieving the bid in ld, but had problems giving it out. That was my fault. Ryan and I and some other kids from vegas registered under a fake school name “McGrath Preparatory Academy” (yeah, we thought it was funny too).
Don’t register under fake names.
Unless your coach won’t let you travel.
Then get your “by any means” on.
Posted from: 70.87.66.66
March 1st, 2007 10:50
Just stopped by to visit and got the crunch on your stuff in here - bravo!